Test - Review: EchtJung.com

Test: EchtJung.com

Test - Review: EchtJung.com

Test: EchtJung.com

0 24,139

Pornsitetest: Review of the teen porn site EchtJung.com (RealYoung)

Good German porn sites are rare and we are always loo­king for sex sites that we can recom­mend to you. Especially in demand are very young women over 18, who are fucked by expe­ri­en­ced porn­stars wit­hout mercy!

At Echtjung.com, visi­tors can expect „pho­tos and vide­os of real young teen sluts“, none of whom are over 20 years old. It is also pro­mi­sed the youn­gest legal teens to be found with inter­net. We are curious to see how the ero­tic site per­forms in our test.

In this test report, we have com­pi­led our expe­ri­en­ces with the teen­sex site EchtJung.com. We descri­be the advan­ta­ges and dis­ad­van­ta­ges and tell you whe­ther a mem­ber­ship is worth it. Feel free to leave a com­ment below the review if you have any ques­ti­ons or want to share your opinion.

Visit EchtJung.com

Opinion about the preview area of EchtJung.com

In the pre­view area, three pret­ty young girls look at the visi­tor. Their names are sup­po­sedly Sabrina Schmidt, Veronika Bauer and Angelika Scherer. In addi­ti­on, a few per­so­nal details about age and their respec­ti­ve sexu­al pre­fe­ren­ces are given 

It is pro­mi­sed that here are the youn­gest teens to see and that there are regu­lar updates. All con­tent is sup­po­sed to be uncen­so­red and in best quality 

Under „older updates“ you can see a few faces of some other girls. Every fur­ther click leads to the regis­tra­ti­on form, where you can also see the price for the access. All in all quite nice­ly done. I also like the lay­out rela­tively well.

Rating of the porn sites registration

The regis­tra­ti­on is done through the bil­ling com­pa­ny Netdebit. This is a cen­tral bil­ling com­pa­ny for many dif­fe­rent ero­tic pro­jects from dif­fe­rent pro­vi­ders. This crea­tes trust, becau­se Netdebit is one of the lar­gest com­pa­nies of this kind in Germany and accor­din­gly the pay­ment pro­ces­sing is safe and serious.

In the Netdebit regis­tra­ti­on form, you have to enter your per­so­nal data and spe­ci­fy the pay­ment method and boo­king packa­ge. If ever­y­thing is fil­led in cor­rect­ly, you will recei­ve an e‑mail from Netdebit with the access data to the mem­ber area after sen­ding the data.


Test – Review Member Area

You can log in to the mem­ber area via the pre­view page. Fortunately, there is no AVS sys­tem in bet­ween, so you have imme­dia­te access to all contents.

The first look into the mem­ber area cau­sed a sting­ing fron­tal lobe hea­da­che becau­se a blin­ding, poison-green page with a few white text links burns into my tor­tu­red eyes.

Below that is an ugly table with a few postage-stamp-sized video screen­shots and a box with a link and access data to the bonus pages. All arran­ged on one etern­al­ly long page, wit­hout a menu, set descrip­ti­ons or any­thing like that.

A pic­tu­re gal­lery is sear­ched in vain – there is none. It’s a pity that I expec­ted the gal­le­ries to be arran­ged at least as it was shown in the pre­view. So with model name, thumb­nail and the pre­fe­ren­ces. Instead there is only a list with cryp­tic links to seve­ral ZIP down­loads, which turn out to be image gal­le­ries after down­loa­ding and unpack­ing. For exam­p­le, Sabrina Schmidt beco­mes „006135“ or Angelika Scherer beco­mes „001357“.

I find that abso­lut­e­ly poor and I have the fee­ling to have been foo­led – and not only becau­se of the poor pre­sen­ta­ti­on of the con­tent, but also becau­se of the small amount of con­tent. Just 26 image sets with 2335 pho­tos and 18 vide­os of 2 minu­tes each is all you get for your money. (Apart from the bonus pages with just as litt­le content).

The pro­mi­sed regu­lar updates do not exist, at least they are not reco­gnizable. There is also no infor­ma­ti­on whe­ther the word „regu­lar“ means every 2 weeks or every 5 years.

Eighteen miserable teensex videos

Via the mini-pictures (video screen­shots) under the pic­tu­re links you can down­load the vide­os. Unfortunately there is no WMV strea­ming or flash play­er. The down­load speed of about 370 kb/s is suf­fi­ci­ent and the files are fast on the hard disk.

The 18 vide­os of 2 min each con­tain almost exclu­si­ve­ly (bor­ing) sce­nes in which women, bet­ween 20–30 years old, suck around on some cocks. The state­ment in the pre­view that these are sup­po­sed to be the youn­gest teens on the net is an out­right lie.

The qua­li­ty is not very impres­si­ve, with a reso­lu­ti­on of 320×240 pixels. On top of that, the sound in the clips has been repla­ced by a bad syn­the­si­zer sound­track, which trig­ge­red sheer hor­ror in me. How is one sup­po­sed to get a „high“ with such abso­lut­e­ly crap­py music??? So any­thing but the pro­mi­sed „best qua­li­ty“, I’m disappointed.

The teen photos are unfortunately nothing special

The 26 photo-series with about 90 pic­tures each are a bit bet­ter, I even liked some of them. However, the series are alre­a­dy a bit dusty and are mass-produced from an ame­ri­can pro­duc­tions of the late 1990s.

So not­hing is exclu­si­ve here, but the qua­li­ty is almost always accep­ta­ble to very good. However, the women here are also for the most part well over 20 years old and not real teens.

Opinions on page layout & design

The pre­view lay­out looks quite nice, but the pre­sen­ta­ti­on of the con­tent in the mem­ber area is sub­stan­dard. The aggres­si­ve light green burns your eyes out of your head and the bad con­trast of the white links makes you despera­te­ly call for the eye doctor.

Not even a pic­tu­re gal­lery is offe­red here, but only stran­ge links with ZIP down­loads, where you don’t know what you are down­loa­ding. All seems to be unkind and quick­ly slap­ped tog­e­ther, becau­se gra­phic ele­ments and descrip­ti­ve texts are com­ple­te­ly missing.

Experience with subscription cancellation

One does not find any infor­ma­ti­on on this porn site and in the e‑mail boo­king con­fir­ma­ti­on how to can­cel the sub­scrip­ti­on. This is pro­ba­b­ly also not to be made as easy as pos­si­ble for the customer.

Fortunately, it is the bil­ling com­pa­ny Netdebit. The cus­to­mer can log in here with the Netdebit user data: http://www.netdebit-payment.de/go/customer/login and can­cel the sub­scrip­ti­on with 2 mouse clicks via the „Bookings“ link. A con­fir­ma­ti­on of can­cel­la­ti­on is then sent by e‑mail.

Review verdict & conclusion of the EchtJung.com test report

EchtJung.com pro­mi­ses a lot in the pre­view and deli­vers litt­le. Real teens under the age of 20 are just as scar­ce here as a reasonable pre­sen­ta­ti­on of the con­tent in the mem­ber area.

Information about updates, sub­scrip­ti­ons, and can­cel­la­ti­ons can­not be found and seems to be deli­bera­te­ly concealed.

The qua­li­ty and con­tent of the much too short video clips are sim­ply pathe­tic and the pho­tos are cheap mass-produced goods from the USA.

In addi­ti­on, the amount of con­tent hard­ly jus­ti­fies the price that is char­ged month­ly. No access to 57 „bonus sites“, which are of simi­lar­ly poor qua­li­ty as EchtJung.com, is of any consolation.

Visit EchtJung.com
Website infor­ma­ti­on
Country of operator:
Cost:€24.99 / month (sub­scrip­ti­on)
Test / Demo – Access:no
Payment methods:Credit card, direct debit, pay per call (tele­pho­ne), bank transfer
Member manage­ment:yes
Youth pro­tec­tion filter:no
Download limit:yes
Cross-selling pre­sel­ec­ted:no
Offered con­tent
Photos / Images:
Quantity:2,335 porn images
Ø Resolution:1024×768 pixels
Image gal­lery control:no
ZIP archi­ves:yes
Number:18 porn movies
Ø Resolution:320×240
Ø Length:2 minu­tes
Ø DL speed:370 kB/sec
Download pos­si­ble:yes
Streaming pos­si­ble:no
DRM copy protection:no


Test report summary for EchtJung.com

No recom­men­ded teen sex site

Our test ver­dict is clear: This teen porn­site was obvious­ly built to catch stu­pids. The porn vide­os and sex pho­tos are of low qua­li­ty and not worth the money. There are no updates. You don’t get to know where to can­cel the sub­scrip­ti­on. We recom­mend you to look for other teen­sex sites.


  • Image qua­li­ty – 67%
  • Video qua­li­ty – 0%
  • Sound qua­li­ty – 0%
  • Exclusivity – 0%
  • Models – 50%
  • Authentic emo­ti­ons – 0%
  • Variety – 33%
  • Extraordinary – 0%
  • Content quan­ti­ty – 0%
  • Fairness – 83%
  • Promises / Reality – 0%
  • Sexual sti­mu­la­ti­on – 0%
  • Design – 0%
  • Navigation – 0%
  • Preview area (Tour pages) – 17%
  • Updates – 0%
  • Loading speed – 67%
  • Costs – 67%
  • Price-performance ratio – 0%
  • Payment – 100%
  • Price trans­pa­ren­cy – 67%
  • Advertising / Spam – 100%
  • Subscription can­cel­la­ti­on – 67%
  • Overall impres­si­on – 0%
User Review
0 (0 votes)


  • Nice pre­view layout
  • Partially good photos
  • Fair bil­ling by Netdebit
  • No spam or advertising


  • Too litt­le content
  • No / bare­ly real teens
  • Only ZIP downloads
  • Member area poor­ly designed
You might also like
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x