Test - Review: Flachtitten.net

Test: Flachtitten.net

Test - Review: Flachtitten.net

Test: Flachtitten.net

4 41,107

Review: Review of Flachtitten.net porn site (Topic: small breasts)

Most women with small breasts are asha­med and try to trick with push-up bras. But not all men are into big boobs! A very large per­cen­ta­ge of men like it more mana­geable. A cute bra size B or even smal­ler, look very sexy and aesthetic.

During a walk on the Internet I came across the porn site Flachtitten.net. Very full-bodied it is pro­mi­sed there that you can find „the smal­lest tits of the net“ on this web­site. The mem­bers area is sup­po­sed to be about small-titted women in dif­fe­rent sec­tions and ero­tic niches. As a lover of small breasts (A Cup and AA Cup) I just could not resist with the many adver­ti­sing pro­mi­ses and boo­ked an access for this test report.

In the fol­lo­wing web­site review, we will intro­du­ce you to the mini tits sex site and tell you what con­tent is hid­den in the mem­bers area. I will share my expe­ri­en­ces with you honest­ly and wit­hout any hesitation.

Visit Flachtitten.net

Opinion about the preview area of Flachtitten.net

The pre­view lay­out con­ta­ins only one web page and is held in an eye can­cer dan­ge­rous pink-turquoise tone. However, it looks quite funny with a traf­fic sign, which could be cal­led „BH-Verbot“. Underneath it says, „Bras we don’t need!“

Even though the term „tits“ seems a bit tas­te­l­ess, it still fits the­ma­ti­cal­ly to the porn site and does­n’t seem annoying.

The home­page is divi­ded into dif­fe­rent categories:

  • In the cate­go­ry „Amateur Flat Tits“ two women pre­sent their small breasts. They would be asha­med of their small wasp stings. The pre­view pic­tures exert a cer­tain appeal and increase the expec­ta­ti­on to see more of them in the mem­bers area.
  • Under „teen flat tits“ young girls bet­ween 18 and 20 with mini tits are pro­mi­sed. The young fruits would not even have a breast attach­ment, but only small nipp­les. Although some girls have no tits at all, they are defi­ni­te­ly older than 18. The ope­ra­tor also points out that the women are of age.
  • In the cate­go­ry „Professional Flat Tits“ you can see which German ero­tic models have made it in the porn business.
  • Under the genre „Fetish Flat Tits“ the fetish „small breasts“ is com­bi­ned with other fetis­hes, like S&M, shaving, anal, bon­da­ge, pis­sing and voy­eur. A pro­mi­sing, horny mixture! 

At the bot­tom of the page it says „JOIN NOW“, „Already a mem­ber? Log in here“ and under „STOPPPPPP, OUR TIP!“ is a link to various bonus pages.

The models of the pre­view pic­tures all have rather ama­teur cha­rac­ter. Unfortunately, there is no pre­view area fur­ther on.

Rating of the porn sites registration

By cli­cking on „Become a mem­ber now“ you will be redi­rec­ted to a page of www.affilicash.net with other web­sites of the ope­ra­tor. If you click on „Register now“ a popup with a pay­ment form from NETDEBIT will appear.

But atten­ti­on: This link does not work in the Firefox brow­ser, but only in Internet Explorer. The mem­ber area costs 24,99 EUR per month. It is kind­ly refer­red to the subscription.

Erotikseitentest

Test – Review Memberarea

So, now we come to the mem­ber area – and this is, with respect said: ABSOLUTELY MISERABLE! 

As also in other mem­ber areas tes­ted by us from the ope­ra­tor Affilicash.net was not even made the effort to build a decent mem­ber area, but it was sim­ply a few ZIP-packed image gal­le­ries slap­ped. Either the web­de­si­gner is a total loser or the ope­ra­tor is inten­tio­nal­ly try­ing to rip off the users.

Without any thumb­nails or gal­lery descrip­ti­on texts 56 links to the ZIP files were lis­ted among each other and one feels sim­ply foo­led alre­a­dy when ente­ring the mem­ber area. There also do not help the whole other „BONUS“ gar­ba­ge web pages away.

After unpack­ing the ZIP archi­ves, you find not only the pho­tos, but also thumb­nails and html files crea­ted with a pro­gram cal­led Arles Image Web Page Creator. The ope­ra­tor should have rather included the gal­le­ries in the mem­bers area and offe­red the ZIP down­load as an option.

A few ZIP archives with small mini tits photos

Pornoseitentest

The images have a reso­lu­ti­on of 500 x 375 pixels. This might have been up to date in 1990, where peo­p­le still had a 15″ moni­tor on the table, but to offer such pho­tos nowa­days and take so much money is cheeky.

Small tits, women wit­hout tits or „the smal­lest boobs on the inter­net“ can defi­ni­te­ly not be found, con­tra­ry to the pro­mi­ses of Flachtitten.net! Even if you can occa­sio­nal­ly find a woman with small boobs, most of the models have rather nor­mal tits in bra-size B, C or even D.

However, we like the fact that the down­load speed is quite fast. One rea­ches 380 kB/sec in Germany. Another plus point is that the use of down­load mana­gers is possible.

Updates are not available and are not plan­ned. It is abso­lut­e­ly not fair to rip off cus­to­mers with so litt­le con­tent exclu­si­ve­ly with a month­ly subscription.

Opinions on page structure & design

Not much can be said about the page lay­out and menu struc­tu­re, becau­se there is no real struc­tu­re at all. The pre­view lay­out and the mem­ber area each con­sist of only one page. Since the owner of the site did­n’t even try to crea­te a nice page, there are zero points.

A true flat-titted lover could over­look the nasty pink-turquoise color mix­tu­re, if at least horny porn vide­os and pho­tos could have been found in the mem­ber area 

Experiences with the subscription cancellation

On Flachtitten.net you’ll find no noti­ce of can­cel­la­ti­on. But since the bil­ling is done via Netdebit, one can log in with the Netdebit user data here: http://www.netdebit-payment.de/go/customer/login and under „Bookings“ easi­ly ter­mi­na­te the subscription 

You will then recei­ve a con­fir­ma­ti­on of can­cel­la­ti­on by e‑mail.

Review verdict & conclusion of the Flachtitten.net test report

Flachtitten.net is a great con­cept, an inte­res­t­ing niche – but abso­lut­e­ly badly implemented.

I have rare­ly seen such a bad ero­tic web­site. We noti­ce that most of Affilicash.net ‚s web­sites are so poor­ly done and seem to only aim at user rip-offs. The con­cept seems to be „deli­ver a lot of free bonus pages and the cus­to­mer will for­gi­ve us for the bad ones“.

The pho­tos are too small and poor­ly lit, the lay­out and page struc­tu­re a dis­as­ter. Hands off this website! 

Again the ques­ti­on ari­ses for us: Why can’t / won’t German web­mas­ters crea­te reasonable and high qua­li­ty web­sites? Why does it always have to be rip-off?! Apparently you just have to go to America .

Visit Flachtitten.net
Website Information
Country of operator:
DeutschlandGermany
Language:German
Cost:24,99 EUR / month (Subscription)
Rebilling:yes
Test / Demo – Access:no
Payment methods:Credit card, direct debit, pay per call (tele­pho­ne), bank transfer
Billing:Netdebit
Member manage­ment:yes
Youth pro­tec­tion filter:no
Download limit:yes
Updates:none
Cross-selling pre­sel­ec­ted:no
Offered con­tent
Photos / Images:
Number:5,000 Porn images
Ø Resolution:500x 75 pixels
Image gal­lery control:no
ZIP archi­ves:yes
Videos:
Quantity:0 porn movies
Language:-
Ø Resolution:-
Ø Length:-
Ø DL Speed:-
Format:-
Download pos­si­ble:-
Streaming pos­si­ble:-
DRM copy protection:-

Screenshots

Test report summary for Flachtitten.net

Stay away from this porn site!

This porn site is one of the worst in the world. Don’t spend any money on it.

Overall
31%
31%
  • Image qua­li­ty – 17%
    17%
  • Video qua­li­ty – 0%
    0%
  • Sound qua­li­ty – 0%
    0%
  • Exclusivity – 0%
    0%
  • Models – 0%
    0%
  • Authentic emo­ti­ons – 0%
    0%
  • Variety – 17%
    17%
  • Extraordinary – 50%
    50%
  • Content quan­ti­ty – 17%
    17%
  • Fairness – 83%
    83%
  • Promises / Reality – 50%
    50%
  • Sexual sti­mu­la­ti­on – 0%
    0%
  • Design – 0%
    0%
  • Navigation – 50%
    50%
  • Preview area (Tour pages) – 0%
    0%
  • Updates – 0%
    0%
  • Loading speed – 67%
    67%
  • Costs – 50%
    50%
  • Price-performance ratio – 0%
    0%
  • Payment – 100%
    100%
  • Price trans­pa­ren­cy – 83%
    83%
  • Advertising / Spam – 33%
    33%
  • Subscription can­cel­la­ti­on – 100%
    100%
  • Overall impres­si­on – 17%
    17%
Sending 
User Review
0 (0 votes)

Pros

  • Great idea
  • Transparent pay­ment process

Cons

  • Bad and too less content
  • Bad design
  • Too expen­si­ve
  • No gal­lery overview
You might also like
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
4 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
4
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x