Test - Review: Webamateure.net

Test: WebAmateure.net

Test - Review: Webamateure.net

Test: WebAmateure.net

0 9,884

Review: Test Report of my Experience with the pornsite WebAmateure.net

After having lan­ded on our bel­lies seve­ral times with num­e­rous German-language sex sites, we hoped to find high-quality pic­tures at least in the ama­teur sec­tor. On WebAmateure.net poten­ti­al cus­to­mers are pro­mi­sed that this pro­ject is about real ama­teurs from Germany, Austria and Switzerland. 

WebAmateure.net is one of the lar­gest German-speaking ama­teur sites. This bold state­ment is reason enough to take a look behind the scenes.

In the fol­lo­wing adult web­site review, we want to intro­du­ce you to the porn site WebAmateure.net. Feel free to share your per­so­nal opi­ni­ons and expe­ri­en­ces below the test report.

Visit Webamateure.net

Opinion about the preview area of Webamateure.net

The pre­view lay­out con­sists of two pages with about 140 thumb­nail pho­tos. They can­not be enlar­ged and text is used spa­rin­gly. Due to the ama­teu­rish cha­rac­ter of the pho­tos and the pro­mi­sed German lan­guage, one is howe­ver quite moti­va­ted to com­ple­te an account. 

The slo­gan at the end of the page sounds authen­tic and sup­ports the ama­teur cha­rac­ter: „If a girl is 18 years old and not came­ra shy, she should let the site ope­ra­tor film her(?!). It would recei­ve then apart from a tip of 400 EUR, also a free annu­al mem­ber­ship.“ Thus, the rea­der should cer­tain­ly be made aware that vide­os are also to be seen in the mem­ber area.

Porn page rating – The registration

No mat­ter where you click, you easi­ly and ine­vi­ta­b­ly get to a page with a big green but­ton „Register Now“. Clicking the sign up but­ton opens a pay­ment win­dow in a JavaScript popup. With a hig­her brow­ser secu­ri­ty level, or Javascript tur­ned off, the pay­ment win­dow does not open. Instead the Netdebit start page is opened.

Payments can be made by cre­dit card, direct debit and instant bank trans­fer in the Netdebit form. In addi­ti­on, pay­ment can also be made via phone pay. The access data for the mem­ber area is sent imme­dia­te­ly after suc­cessful pay­ment. Information about the sub­scrip­ti­ons is only given in the Netdebit pay­ment window.

Test – Review Member Area

When you enter the mem­ber area, you get a shock! Suddenly, the design is not so nice­ly deco­ra­ted with thumb­nails. A simp­le lis­ting with the words „Gallery 1“ to „Gallery 63“ can be seen on the start page. Clicking on each of the links opens a new brow­ser win­dow with the thumb­nails of the cal­led gal­lery. The page design is abso­lut­e­ly ugly. No effort was made to make the tem­p­la­te for the gal­lery crea­ti­on pro­gram a bit nicer.

But even more cheeky is the reso­lu­ti­on with 500 x 375 pixels and qua­li­ty of the pre­sen­ted pho­tos. That ama­teur pic­tures are a bit blur­ry, not fully illu­mi­na­ted and some­ti­mes blur­red is ok. But these pho­tos are the last crap!

Primarily you can see again and again gal­le­ries, which were taken in a gar­den house with the most dif­fe­rent girls. The girls pose bor­ing and unspec­ta­cu­lar. You can always see the gor­ge­ous sheet pile walls and the red glo­wing elec­tric hea­ter. Alternating the gal­le­ries are low-quality hotel room pho­tos and also pri­va­te apartments. 

No German Amateurs!

But if you look clo­se­ly at the pic­tures, you will always see American elec­tri­cal out­lets and hotel escape plans writ­ten in an unfa­mi­li­ar lan­guage on the room doors (When the girls get into the hotel room, they are often pho­to­gra­phed doing so).

From this you can CERTAINLY see that the pho­tos are not of German, Austrian or Swiss girls. It is strict­ly spea­king and chea­p­ly bought tog­e­ther image con­tent, which are cer­tain­ly dozens of times mir­rored on the pro­jects of Afillicash.

Also, the „vide­os“ sug­gested in the pre­view lay­out are not to be found. WebAmateure.net is defi­ni­te­ly only a pic­tu­re site. None of the offe­red gal­le­ries is sti­mu­la­ting. We were also extre­me­ly annoy­ed by the fact that there are no ongo­ing updates – which is pure cheek for the high month­ly fees. The offe­red bonus gal­le­ries of AfilliCash are also help over this short­co­ming also not away.

Opinions on page structure & design

At least there are not only ZIP archi­ves on this web­site of AffiliCash. But the image pages crea­ted by the pro­gram „Areles Image WebPage Creator“ are not bet­ter. Because of the few thumb­nails per page, you are only cli­cking and quick­ly lose moti­va­ti­on. Since there are no thumb­nails on the mem­ber main page, you often don’t know which gal­le­ries you have alre­a­dy visi­ted and which not.

Experiences with the subscription cancellation

An important aspect is the trans­pa­ren­cy and sim­pli­ci­ty of the can­cel­la­ti­on. As on many other German-language pro­jects, the can­cel­la­ti­on opti­on is deli­bera­te­ly con­cea­led on the website. 

Also, in the email text one reads not­hing to the sub­scrip­ti­on. As a Netdebit cus­to­mer, howe­ver, you know that you can can­cel via the URL its­elf. So the accu­sa­ti­on of sub­scrip­ti­on rip-off also appli­es to this site.

Review judgement & conclusion of the Webamateure.net test report

To put it blunt­ly, the WebAmateure.net web­site is a case of frau­du­lent decep­ti­on. The pro­mi­sed „real“ ama­teurs, who are only sup­po­sed to come from Germany, Austria and Switzerland, are a sheer mockery. 

The stamp size of the pic­tures are very annoy­ing and jus­ti­fy the proud price of (month­ly!) 24.99 EUR in no way. The pho­tos are bought tog­e­ther from America and are abso­lut­e­ly infe­ri­or. There are no ongo­ing updates and the say­ing that this is one of the big­gest ama­teur sites is defi­ni­te­ly untrue. 

The web­site deve­lo­per should also take some reme­di­al trai­ning. Design, lay­out and struc­tu­re are a dis­as­ter. We are start­ing to get real­ly pissed off when you see how German-speaking web­mas­ters, like Affilicash, rip off your cus­to­mers. Why don’t the web­mas­ters make any effort!!!

Visit Webamateure.net
Website infor­ma­ti­on
Country of operator:
DeutschlandGermany
Language:German
Cost:€29.99 / Month (Subscription)
Rebilling:yes
Test / Demo – Access:no
Payment methods:Credit card, direct debit, pay-per-call (tele­pho­ne), bank transfer
Billing:Netdebit
Member manage­ment:yes
Youth pro­tec­tion filter:no
Download limit:no
Updates:none
Cross-selling pre­sel­ec­ted:no
Offered con­tent
Photos / Images:
Number:2,000 Porn images
Ø Resolution:500 x 375 pixels
Image gal­lery control:no
ZIP archi­ves:yes
Videos:
Quantity:0 porn movies
Language:-
Ø Resolution:-
Ø Length:-
Ø DL Speed:-
Format:-
Download pos­si­ble:-
Streaming pos­si­ble:-
DRM copy protection:-

Screenshots

Test report summary for Webamateure.net

A very bad porn site

It is com­ple­te­ly incom­pre­hen­si­ble how the web­site ope­ra­tors with a good con­sci­ence want to request money for such a mise­ra­ble porn site. A mem­ber­ship is not recom­men­ded at all! 

Overall
19%
19%
  • Image qua­li­ty – 0%
    0%
  • Video qua­li­ty – 0%
    0%
  • Sound qua­li­ty – 0%
    0%
  • Exclusivity – 0%
    0%
  • Models – 0%
    0%
  • Authentic emo­ti­ons – 0%
    0%
  • Variety – 0%
    0%
  • Extraordinary – 17%
    17%
  • Content quan­ti­ty – 0%
    0%
  • Fairness – 17%
    17%
  • Promises / Reality – 17%
    17%
  • Sexual sti­mu­la­ti­on – 0%
    0%
  • Design – 17%
    17%
  • Navigation – 50%
    50%
  • Preview area (Tour pages) – 17%
    17%
  • Updates – 0%
    0%
  • Loading speed – 50%
    50%
  • Costs – 50%
    50%
  • Price-performance ratio – 0%
    0%
  • Payment – 83%
    83%
  • Price trans­pa­ren­cy – 33%
    33%
  • Advertising / Spam – 50%
    50%
  • Subscription can­cel­la­ti­on – 50%
    50%
  • Overall impres­si­on – 0%
    0%
Sending 
User Review
0 (0 votes)

Pros

  • German lan­guage

Cons

  • Crap pic­tures
  • False pro­mi­ses
  • Not enough pictures
  • Subscription rip-off
  • Extremely much advertising
  • Email SPAM
You might also like
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x